Pride & Prejudice, ch. 23: Engaging News

Lizzy doesn’t have to spill the beans about Charlotte and Mr. Collins thanks to Sir William, who visits the Bennets mostly to pat himself on the back for his daughter’s engagement. Lydia, unable to handle the fact that she’s been kept out of the loop, flat-out tells him that he’s wrong. Not to justify her rudeness, but it’s understandable that Mr. Collins’s switch from Lizzy to Charlotte would cause some whiplash. Lizzy finally admits to her family that she knows about it so that they can stop doubting Sir William.


Mrs. Bennet is too shocked to be catty in front of Sir William. But once he leaves, she melts into an angry puddle and wails that everyone has mistreated her (to be fair, Lady Lucas’s insistently visiting her to rub it in, while not abusive, is still rather vindictive). Mr. Bennet laughs the whole thing off, which is the intellectually appropriate response, if not exactly the morally appropriate one. Though it’s rather rich of him to compare Charlotte’s “foolish[ness]” to his wife’s. Charlotte is marrying Mr. Collins so that she can get out of her relatively low position. What did you marry Mrs. Bennet for, Mr. Bennet? Oh, because you were horny? And now your family is virtually poor? Then you don’t have much room to judge, do you?

Happily, Jane’s reaction is a better balance of genuine sincerity and surprise. No extra analysis here. Jane just brings me a lot of relief.

Come to think of it, Lizzy feels the same way about her sister. Fearing that the close bond she had with Charlotte is fraying, Lizzy becomes more involved with her big sister’s love trials. Jane’s reply to Miss Bingley has not been answered, and they finally hear via the latest Meryton gossip that Bingley is staying put in London. Lizzy surmises that the Bingley sisters plus Darcy plus Miss Darcy plus the novelty of London might outweigh his feelings for Jane, at least for the season. Jane is far too nervous to talk about any of this, and I can’t blame her.

Mrs. Bennet is doing most of the fretting on her eldest’s behalf, though it offers very little relief, especially when she mixes in her grousing about the Lucases, anxiety that Charlotte is counting down the days until she and Mr. Collins legally own Longbourn, and complaints that Mr. Collins chooses to keep staying with the Bennets rather than the Lucases now that he’s engaged (and unless there’s some rule I’m missing here, I’m inclined to agree with her on this last point). The dunderhead writes an overwhelming thank you note and accepts their vague invitation to visit again … two weeks later. Then he does. That is a lot of Collins to handle in the span of four or five weeks. One can assume he likes being there partly to show off to Lizzy that he got someone to agree to marry him.

Mr. Bennet is no help at all, though to be fair, there’s not much at this point that would help Mrs. Bennet (short of a therapist, or even a life coach). He jokes that maybe he’ll outlive her, then she won’t have to worry about seeing Longbourn pass over to the Collinses. They have fun [fake chuckle].

But mid-fret, Mrs. Bennet does bring up an interesting point: “Why should he have [the estate] more than anybody else?” I mean, the answer is because he’s part of the lineage, but that doesn’t mean he deserves what he’s getting. It certainly doesn’t mean that he deserves it over a family of women who will need a home once their father dies. As a “have” verging on a “have-not,” Mrs. Bennet (and indeed her husband, if he ever wants to join reality), has a unique perspective on wealth and, I daresay, the patriarchal structure of the Regency upper-class economy. Mr. Bennet elects to not engage in an actual discussion with his wife because she’s too wrapped up in her own victimhood, but that doesn’t mean her question is worthless. After all, if she lived in a society that didn’t put pressure on women to marry for the sake of their livelihood, Mrs. Bennet might be a completely different kind of mother. And I might not complain about Mr. Bennet so much.

And Volume 1 ends … here??? Okay, Austen.

Chapter the soon: News arrives that put a major dent in Jingley, Jane does her best to accept it, and Lizzy is a downer.

Comments

  1. I must admit I found Mr. Bennet’s comments irritating. His refusal to face the economic situation of his family is hard to accept in a character we are supposed to like.
    I wondered about why Mr. Collins didn’t stay with the Lucases on his second visit and I decided it might be very simple. 1. Wouldn’t anyone get rid of Mr. Collins if they could? 2. The Lucas family is a large one and may simply have not had a spare room for him. Or at least it would be a great way to not have him in the house 24/7. (Although we are told he spends most of his time during the day on his second visit over at the Lucas place.)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think your second point is the reason. Most likely the Bennetts also keep a better table than the Lucases. 😅

      Delete
  2. I think Mr Bennet's joke at his wife's expence is rather witty (unsurprisingly, as Jane Austen gave it to him). And before accusing him of unkindness, we shouldn't forget that his remark is only a rejoinder - after all, Mrs Bennet has been equally unkind in her assumption that he'll be the one to die first.
    I can't agree with Dorothy that we're supposed to like Mr Bennet. It's true that Elizabeth does, but all Jane's characters are rounded and she has endowed him with many faults to set against his superficial charms. Indeed she even lets the unpleasant Lady Catherine make the perfectly valid point that, with such a silly wife, he should have employed a governess, in which case the younger sisters might well have turned out a lot better.
    I believe he is also partly responsible for the entail, and contemporary readers would have been much more aware of that than we are. I believe the entail could possibly have been cancelled had Mr Bennet, as the next recipient, and his father both agreed to it. If Mr Bennet had wished it, but his father disagreed, we might expect him to have mentioned it. Instead, he just ducks his wife's question, which could perhaps be the result of a guilty conscience?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't think he would have felt the need to while his father was alive. One probably doesn't consider that one may not have any sons until you have several daughters in succession.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts